Dev C++ Slow Compile
Stack up to 256 wavetables on a single oscillator, import wavetables that look like cartoon characters, or draw your own custom manipulations and see how they sound.The award-winning synth’s stable of built-in effects includes everything you’d expect, like reverb and EQ, as well as some surprises, like Hyper. They’re a sandbox you can make your own. Xfer serum 1.2 download torrent. Serum’s artifact-free resampling keeps its oscillators crystal clear on any sound system, which is perfect for those glassy leads or angelic pads. But clean oscillators mean they can also dirty up your decibels down to the decimal without muddying up your mix.Serum’s wavetables aren’t static.
- If you find compilation slow then yes, it is probably recompiling things that it doesn't really need to recompile. This has always been a major failing of the Arduino environment, and is one of the major impetuses for the complete re-write of the whole compilation system in my IDE UECIDE. That includes very aggressive caching of compiled library and core files as proper '.a' files which are.
- The STL is slow and most build tools used to compile C are slow. However there are faster tools and ways to mitigate the slow parts of the language. Using them takes a bit of elbow grease, but the benefits are undeniable. Faster build times lead to happier developers, more agility and, eventually, better code.
I wrote a very simple code to kinda stress test my PC, couldn't think of anything so I just thought to make 1 000 000 random MD5 hashes. It works very well for me.
You can see the code here: http://pastebin.com/ER5uwL2i
MD5 library: http://www.zedwood.com/article/cpp-md5-function
Now the problem is that I wanted to try out C++11 (just to mess around with threads.. I know, not the best reason).
I have always used Bloodshed's DevC++ (GCC 3.4.2, 32-bit I think), so I tested out the code with it and had no problems, I was even very satisfied - 1kk MD5 hashes in 10 seconds.
Wanted to see if I can make it faster with threads, but I needed C++11 (didn't want to use pthreads). After the first search - Orwell's DevC++ is what I need (TDM-GCC 4.8.1 64-bit). The same simple code executes much slower - 1kk MD5 hashes in 34 seconds.
That is a problem, I tried to mess with compiler options, such as:
-std=C++11
-m64
-O2/Os (and others)
-march=sandy (since I have Intel i5-2430M)
-mavx/MMX/3Dnow
-s
-mwindows (don't need the console)
But none of these options made any difference.
Here is my makefile (if it helps): http://pastebin.com/wGydN9h8
What could be causing this huge performance difference?
Compile C++ In Vs Code
Dev-C Compiler in Windows 8 is too slow. I need your help to solve my problem. I've just upgraded my Windows from 7 Ultimate to 8, and my Dev-C (latest version - 5.7.1) it's compiler is becoming slower than when I use it in Windows 7 environment. It takes more than 20 seconds to compile a simple program with 86 lines of code.